Lesen Sie eine Rezension
EXPERT REVIEWS
Independent FireMaple Reviews & Field Tests
See how independent outdoor publications evaluate FireMaple gear in lab tests and real-world use. We include both strengths and limitations so you can choose the right setup.
OutdoorGearLab
64/100 · Tested
Fire Maple Fixed Star 1 Review
View Star X1
After months of field and lab testing, OutdoorGearLab described the Fixed Star 1 as a budget-priced integrated system that is easy to use and hard to beat for value, while ranking it 14th of 16 in its test group.
- What stood out
- Low price, burn protection, generous pot handle and a measured 2:41 boil time for 0.5 L.
- What to consider
- Heavy, less packable and weaker at simmering than several competitors; overall score 64/100.
GearJunkie
8.8/10 · Tested
An Ultralight Cookpot for Around $30: Fire Maple Petrel Ultralight G2 Pot
View Petrel G2
GearJunkie rated the G2 8.8/10 and called it an ideal backpacking cookpot, highlighting its balance of weight, capacity, useful features and price.
- What stood out
- Weight-to-capacity balance, heat exchanger, pour spout, quick cooling and compact organization.
- What to consider
- A 230g canister and stove cannot nest together, and the lid is not leakproof.
Adventure Alan
No numeric score · Tested
Firemaple Petrel Pot G3 Review
View Petrel G3
Adventure Alan called the G3 one of the best solo pots and likely the most compact, citing its notched heat-exchanger base, secure stove support and strong value.
- What stood out
- Low weight, price, fuel economy, wind protection and secure three-arm stove notches.
- What to consider
- Narrow proportions, capacity-label confusion and semi-sharp edges that can snag delicate gear.
SectionHiker
No numeric score · Timed
Fire Maple Fixed Star FMS-X1 Canister Stove System Review
View Star X1
SectionHiker found the X1 affordable and functional for two-cup boils, but concluded that the burner was underpowered for the large pot when filled to one liter.
- What stood out
- Low price, integrated pot, piezo ignition, flame control and a measured 3:25 two-cup boil.
- What to consider
- The measured one-liter boil took 10:20, and the system did not include a canister stand.
The Great Outdoors
Best in Test · Field tested
Fire Maple Petrel Titanium Ultralight Review
View Petrel Titanium
The Great Outdoors named the Petrel Titanium Ultralight a Best in Test. Chris Townsend called it a favourite after Scottish Highlands field use and controlled boil testing.
- What stood out
- 95.5g weight, low profile, compact fold, stability, price, strong boiling and useful simmer control.
- What to consider
- No preheat tube or piezo igniter; output declined with a near-empty canister, making it primarily a three-season stove.
The Outdoor Gear Review
No numeric score · Video
This Stove is Seriously Different & I Could Make It Better
View Quickboil Pro
The Outdoor Gear Review described the Quickboil Pro as unique, lightweight, powerful and inexpensive, while arguing that one simple design change could make it better.
- What stood out
- Unusual integrated design, low carry weight, strong output and accessible price.
- What to consider
- The review is qualitative and publishes no numeric score; watch the full video for the proposed design change.
Summaries are paraphrased from the original reviews. Numeric scores are shown only when the publisher displays one; “No numeric score” means the source did not publish a formal rating. Visit each source for the complete assessment.

